Monday, October 04, 2004

Terrorist South of the Border

Last month Time magazine did an article suddenly discovering that the U.S./Mexico boarder is a sieve that lets millions of people and tons of drugs pass across it every year. In an age of terrorism, this looks like a disaster waiting to happen. If migrant workers and drug runners can cross the border then obviously terrorist can do so just as easily.

A look at the empirical evidence, however, suggest just the opposite. Comparing Mexico to our other border with Canada we find that while several dozen suspected and actual terrorist have been caught crossing over from Canada none have been caught trying to cross over from Mexico. Moreover, none have been found in the U.S. after having passed through Mexico. If the Mexican border is such a security sieve why do the terrorist not flock there in droves?

The answer is easy. Mexico isn't the place most Americans imagine it is.

The first answer to the riddle is that the U.S./Mexican border is a apparent sieve because the vast majority of Mexicans want it to be. Mexico exerts no internal pressure to control its own border. Nobody in Mexico, from the richest to the poorest, from the most honest to the most corrupt has any motive to stop the flow of current flow of people and goods over the border.

Both the poor and the oligarchs alike need the flow of illegal migrant workers into the U.S. The poor desperately need the work and the oligarchs desperately need the social safety valve it provides. Remittences are second only to oil in Mexico's sources of foreign currency. Without the remittences from U.S. based working Mexicans, the nations economy would collapse.

Drugs flow across the border for the same reason. Mexico makes a lot of money off the drug trade. Even the vast majority of Mexicans who oppose the drug trade on moral grounds are not going to stick their necks out to save some rich gringo kid from OD'ing. They've got their own problems. It's easier just to let the Drug Lords do their business.

The great myth about Mexico is that it is a disorganized society where nothing gets done efficiently. The truth is that Mexico is a highly organized and strictly ordered society. The problem is that it is organized on a medieval system of family and patronage. The goal of Mexican organization is statis and it does that job very well.

For example, a guild system still functions for most small businesses in Mexico. All the tailors work on the same street and charge the same prices. Nobody gets anything done with buying into a patronage network. Even Drug Lords must buy into this system. Formal institutions like courts and regulatory agencies don't function like people in the developed world expect them to but that does not mean that their are no rules it just means the rules are cultural and strongly tied to specific individuals.

For example, Mexican police can be highly efficient when it comes to providing security around major tourist hotspots. For one thing, they aren't hampered by such legal niceties as a presumption of innocence for subjects. When it is in the communities collective interest that tourist feel safe around the major hotels well then suddenly Mexico is a model of efficiency.

The U.S./Mexico border is therefore largely safe from terrorist infiltration. A successful terrorist attack originating from Mexico would lead to a militarization of the border which would be a disaster for everybody from migrant workers to Drug Lords. You can bet that everybody is on the look out for any terrorist who might spoil the sweet deal the Mexicans have now. If the Mexicans suspected that somebody might be a terrorist every power in the country, formal and informal, legal and illegal would be gunning for them.

I suspect that some terrorist have tried to travel through Mexico into the U.S. I also suspect they now inhabit anonymous graves somewhere.

Terrorist need an environment of a limited state in order to operate. Mexico does not have that. Its structures are largely informal and cultural but they are no less omnipresent for that. It is far easier for terrorist to operate in Canada than Mexico.

I think the Mexican border, guarded by the organic self-interest of tens of millions of Mexicans, is far safer than the law-bound border with Canada.

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't explain it, but I posted here earlier today, but where is it. This is the third time in two weeks it's happened.

MaDr

October 5, 2004 at 5:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

a uh no terrorists comming through Mexico
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041013-121643-5028r.htm

NOT!

Nicely written and thought out article but the reality is the average Mexican has stopping terrorists I would think just about last on his list of worries.

October 13, 2004 at 6:19 AM  
Blogger Shannon Love said...

Anonymous,

Actually, the article just says that we have intelligence reports of terrorists passing through Mexico. We haven't actually found any who have.

The fact remains that while we have caught dozens of actual terrorists coming over the border from Canada we haven't caught any coming over from Mexico. We can presume that if they did cross they would strike soon after doing so. This strongly suggest that the border with Mexico is more secure than the one with Canada.

October 13, 2004 at 6:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not arguing whether or not we have a strong border with Canada or Mexico. My only point is this: Your view that our border with Mexico is largely safe from terrorist infiltration due to the organic self interest of its populace is in my opion a gigantic leap of faith. I can assure you the average Mexican is not looking for terrorists or is thinking about the political ramifications of allowing terrorists to pass through the border. More importantly I certainly as an American do NOT want to rely on their self interest to protect me.

October 13, 2004 at 11:01 AM  
Blogger Shannon Love said...

Anonymous,

My main point was not that we could just ignore the Mexican border but rather it was far more secure than most people assume. Also, given the empirical evidence, if we have a limited amount of resources and political capital to expend we should concentrate on securing the Canadian border before the Mexican.

It's like having your property bordered on one side by a gleaming high tech fence and on the other side by a gully naturally full of briars. The fence is intentional and looks good but it is easier to cut through a chain link fence than 15 horizontal feet of briar.

Sometimes the accidental solution works better.

October 13, 2004 at 11:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well Shannon the evidence grows each day that in fact our border with Mexico is not as secure as you think. Recent articles such as those discussing ms13 gangs in Boston smuggling terrorists over the border with mexico would fly in the face of your article. Don't think for one millisecond any Mexican or for that matter anyone living in Mexico would not assist someone over the border for the almighty dollar. Your eloquently worded but flawed theory just flies in the face of reason and is too complicated to be believed. Occams Razor: the simplest explantion is usually the right one. IE Pay me dollars and I help you get over the border. That simple.

January 6, 2005 at 8:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems a silly assumption to say that b/c we haven't caught terrorist coming over yet, they aren't comming over. Millions of illegals get through each year with next to no money or support. It's pretty safe to say a well funded terrorist can get through. My understanding is that we have already caught quite a few non-spanish-speaking individuals crossing the Mexican border into the U.S.

My parents lived in Mexico City for 3 years, btw, and your assertion that it is a well disciplined place when needed is completely false. Kidnapping is one of the biggest business down there, and kidnapping wealthy foreign tourist is a mainstay.

Either way, the border needs to be shut, period. We are a soveriegn country and should have control of our borders. We have nominal control of the Nothern border b/c Canada works with us. We have no control over the Southern border b/c neither Mexico nor our own politicians want it closed.

To MaDr: I saw your post on another one of her articles. It looks as if it just got posted to the wrong place.

June 23, 2006 at 11:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a great story. Waiting for more. » »

February 21, 2007 at 2:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Enjoyed a lot! »

March 6, 2007 at 9:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

best regards, nice info vermont health insurance Changing headlight 1999 pontiac grand am 32257 hunter care free humidifier order phentermine ip based surveillance cameras Pancreatitis vicodin affiliate program http://www.chrysler-neon-7.info gmc safari accessory Li-ion battery voltage maxabeam laser eye surgery Impotence experiment

April 25, 2007 at 4:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home